tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2966570020272683110.post833169723272663488..comments2024-03-03T06:01:18.201+00:00Comments on Simon PG Edwards: APT testing like it's 2004Simon PG Edwardshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11222957562823909636noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2966570020272683110.post-15600841175162959002014-03-26T17:39:32.996+00:002014-03-26T17:39:32.996+00:00Hi Si, is Chris from MRG.
The bottom line is, tes...Hi Si, is Chris from MRG.<br /><br />The bottom line is, testing needs to change and it is.<br /><br />The problem at the moment in my view in terms of the bad guys, the vendors and labs is that it is in this order:<br /><br />Bad guys - Vendors - Labs<br /><br />The bad guys create their stuff, the vendors respond with new technologies, then the labs create tests to test the technologies createsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2966570020272683110.post-76202006707576707202014-03-25T16:54:27.119+00:002014-03-25T16:54:27.119+00:00while i agree that there's a need to test anti...while i agree that there's a need to test anti-malware products ability to deal with things they've never seen before, i question if making new malware is really the best approach.<br /><br />surely this kind of testing is the same kind of testing APTs perform and keep performing until they find something that works. i don't see that doing less than an APT would really measures how kurt wismerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03810635947269551517noreply@blogger.com